We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Trauma mannequin assessment of management skills of surgical residents after advanced trauma life support training.
Journal of Surgical Research 2000 September
BACKGROUND: We tested the effectiveness of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training among surgical residents using a specially designed mannequin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Postgraduate Year I surgical residents were randomly assigned to two groups of 16 each. By use of a trauma mannequin, the 32 residents' performances were scored using four trauma scenarios before 16 residents (ATLS group) completed a standard ATLS course. Performances were also scored after the ATLS course on another four trauma scenarios. The scores were standardized to a maximum of 20 for each scenario. Organized Approach scores with a range of 1 to 5, Priority scores ranging from 1 to 7, and global ratings of Honors, Pass, Borderline, or Fail were assigned for each clinical scenario.
RESULTS: The pre-ATLS assessment scores were similar for both groups ranging between 9.4 +/- 3.5 and 11.4 +/- 2.9 for the ATLS group and between 10.2 +/- 3.8 and 11.4 +/- 3.9 for the non-ATLS group. The ATLS group scores ranged from 16.0 +/- 1.3 to 17.4 +/- 3.1 after the course and the non-ATLS group scores ranged from 11.4 +/- 4.2 to 12.9 +/- 4.0 (P < 0.05). Pre-ATLS Organized Approach scores were 2.9 +/- 1.0 and 2.7 +/- 1.1 (NS) for the ATLS and non-ATLS groups, respectively, with post-ATLS scores being significantly higher in the ATLS group (4.9 +/- 1.2 compared with 2.8 +/- 1.2 for the non-ATLS group, P < 0. 05). Initial Priority scores were also similar for both groups (3.2 +/- 1.4 for the ATLS group and 3.3 +/- 2.0 for the non-ATLS group). Post-ATLS Priority scores were significantly higher (6.4 +/- 1.4) in the ATLS group compared with 4.2 +/- 1.9 for the non-ATLS group (P < 0.05). The pre-ATLS global ratings were similar for both groups and post-ATLS there were 10 Honors ratings in the ATLS group and none for the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a trauma mannequin, for assessment, surgical residents completing the ATLS course demonstrated superior resuscitation skills compared with a non-ATLS group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Postgraduate Year I surgical residents were randomly assigned to two groups of 16 each. By use of a trauma mannequin, the 32 residents' performances were scored using four trauma scenarios before 16 residents (ATLS group) completed a standard ATLS course. Performances were also scored after the ATLS course on another four trauma scenarios. The scores were standardized to a maximum of 20 for each scenario. Organized Approach scores with a range of 1 to 5, Priority scores ranging from 1 to 7, and global ratings of Honors, Pass, Borderline, or Fail were assigned for each clinical scenario.
RESULTS: The pre-ATLS assessment scores were similar for both groups ranging between 9.4 +/- 3.5 and 11.4 +/- 2.9 for the ATLS group and between 10.2 +/- 3.8 and 11.4 +/- 3.9 for the non-ATLS group. The ATLS group scores ranged from 16.0 +/- 1.3 to 17.4 +/- 3.1 after the course and the non-ATLS group scores ranged from 11.4 +/- 4.2 to 12.9 +/- 4.0 (P < 0.05). Pre-ATLS Organized Approach scores were 2.9 +/- 1.0 and 2.7 +/- 1.1 (NS) for the ATLS and non-ATLS groups, respectively, with post-ATLS scores being significantly higher in the ATLS group (4.9 +/- 1.2 compared with 2.8 +/- 1.2 for the non-ATLS group, P < 0. 05). Initial Priority scores were also similar for both groups (3.2 +/- 1.4 for the ATLS group and 3.3 +/- 2.0 for the non-ATLS group). Post-ATLS Priority scores were significantly higher (6.4 +/- 1.4) in the ATLS group compared with 4.2 +/- 1.9 for the non-ATLS group (P < 0.05). The pre-ATLS global ratings were similar for both groups and post-ATLS there were 10 Honors ratings in the ATLS group and none for the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a trauma mannequin, for assessment, surgical residents completing the ATLS course demonstrated superior resuscitation skills compared with a non-ATLS group.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app