We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Aspirin renography and captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2000 August
UNLABELLED: Preliminary data suggest that aspirin renography is more sensitive than captopril renography for indicating renal artery stenosis (RAS). Considering that aspirin, compared with captopril, reduces renal blood flow and, thus, tubular tracer delivery in poststenotic kidneys, aspirin renography is expected to be more useful, particularly if tubular tracers are used.
METHODS: We prospectively compared aspirin renography (20 mg/kg orally) and captopril renography (25 mg orally) with 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine in 75 consecutive patients suspected of having RAS.
RESULTS: RAS, diagnosed as stenosis of more than 50% on angiography, was found unilaterally in 34 patients and bilaterally in 17 patients. RAS was absent in 24 patients. The sensitivities for unilateral RAS or bilateral RAS (i.e., stenosis that was at least unilateral) were, respectively, 88% and 88% for captopril renography and 82% and 94% for aspirin renography (not significant). The overall specificity was 75% for captopril renography and 83% for aspirin renography (not significant). Tracer uptake ratios, time to peak activity, and percentage of 20-min tracer retention were also not significantly different for captopril and aspirin renography. Subgroup analysis of modest (50-75%) and severe (> or =75%) RAS, or of plasma creatinine greater than 120 micromol/L, also showed no difference between captopril and aspirin renography.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that for identification of RAS, the usefulness of aspirin renography equals, but does not surpass, that of captopril renography.
METHODS: We prospectively compared aspirin renography (20 mg/kg orally) and captopril renography (25 mg orally) with 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine in 75 consecutive patients suspected of having RAS.
RESULTS: RAS, diagnosed as stenosis of more than 50% on angiography, was found unilaterally in 34 patients and bilaterally in 17 patients. RAS was absent in 24 patients. The sensitivities for unilateral RAS or bilateral RAS (i.e., stenosis that was at least unilateral) were, respectively, 88% and 88% for captopril renography and 82% and 94% for aspirin renography (not significant). The overall specificity was 75% for captopril renography and 83% for aspirin renography (not significant). Tracer uptake ratios, time to peak activity, and percentage of 20-min tracer retention were also not significantly different for captopril and aspirin renography. Subgroup analysis of modest (50-75%) and severe (> or =75%) RAS, or of plasma creatinine greater than 120 micromol/L, also showed no difference between captopril and aspirin renography.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that for identification of RAS, the usefulness of aspirin renography equals, but does not surpass, that of captopril renography.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app