Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparative study of the in vitro susceptibilities of clinical and laboratory-selected resistant isolates of Aspergillus spp. to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole (SCH 56592).

We investigated the in vitro susceptibilities of clinical and laboratory-selected Aspergillus spp. to posaconazole, and compared the results with those obtained for amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole. Conidial suspensions from clinical isolates (284 Aspergillus fumigatus, 66 Aspergillus niger, 31 Aspergillus flavus and 43 Aspergillus spp.) and laboratory-selected resistant A. fumigatus isolates (15 resistant to amphotericin B, 25 to itraconazole and 12 to voriconazole) were prepared and their susceptibilities to various antifungal agents determined using a previously described broth macrodilution technique. The geometric mean MICs (mg/L) of posaconazole for A. fumigatus (0.17 +/- 0.11) and non-A. fumigatus aspergilli (0.16 +/- 0.28) were significantly lower (P 0.05) than those for amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole. Amphotericin B-resistant A. fumigatus isolates were as susceptible to posaconazole as the parental strain. Itraconazole- and voriconazole-resistant isolates showed low-level (two- to three-fold increase in MICs) cross-resistance to posaconazole. The minimum fungicidal concentrations (mg/L) of posaconazole for A. fumigatus (n = 58) and non-A. fumigatus aspergilli (n = 40) were 4. 45 +/- 2.70 (range 0.25-8) and 4.14 +/- 3.03 (range 0.5-8), respectively. Time-kill studies showed that the fungicidal activity of posaconazole against A. fumigatus is time- and concentration-dependent (for example, posaconazole 4 mg/L killed >99% of A. fumigatus conidia within 24 h). These results suggest that overall, posaconazole has better activity and a smaller range of MICs for Aspergillus spp., including those with reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app