We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist triptorelin and antagonist cetrorelix inhibit EGF-induced c-fos expression in human gynecological cancers.
Gynecologic Oncology 2000 August
OBJECTIVES: Spontaneous and epidermal growth-factor-induced proliferation of human gynecological cancer cell lines is dose- and time-dependently reduced by treatment with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist triptorelin and antagonist Cetrorelix. This antiproliferative activity is probably directly mediated through the LHRH receptors expressed by the tumor cells interacting with growth-factor-dependent mitogenic signal transduction. We have examined whether epidermal growth-factor (EGF)-induced expression of the early response gene c-fos is reduced by LHRH analogs.
METHODS: Human endometrial (Ishikawa, Hec-1A), ovarian (EFO-21, EFO-27, SK-OV-3), and breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7) were rendered quiescent by incubation (72 h) in the absence of fetal calf serum and phenol red. This was followed by a 15-min incubation in the absence or presence of the LHRH agonist triptorelin (100 nM) or the antagonist Cetrorelix (100 nM) before the cells were stimulated for 10 min with EGF (100 nM). C-fos mRNA expression was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR using a synthetic DNA fragment as internal standard. C-Fos protein synthesis was determined by SDS-PAGE and semi-quantitative Western blotting.
RESULTS: In cells derived from endometrial and ovarian cancer, maximal c-fos mRNA expression (seven- to ninefold over basal level) was obtained 30 min after EGF stimulation. In the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 this effect was obtained 60 min after EGF treatment. In all of the lines expressing LHRH receptor, EGF-induced c-fos mRNA expression as well as c-Fos protein synthesis was dose-dependently reduced by treatment with LHRH agonists and antagonists. At 100 nM concentrations of the LHRH analogs, c-fos expression was reduced to baseline levels. No effect of LHRH analogs on EGF-induced c-fos expression was observed in the ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3, which does not express the LHRH receptor.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the binding of LHRH agonists and antagonists to their receptors inhibits the mitogenic signal transduction pathway of the EGF receptor in endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer cell lines. The coupling of both signal transduction systems mediates the antiproliferative effect of LHRH analogs.
METHODS: Human endometrial (Ishikawa, Hec-1A), ovarian (EFO-21, EFO-27, SK-OV-3), and breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7) were rendered quiescent by incubation (72 h) in the absence of fetal calf serum and phenol red. This was followed by a 15-min incubation in the absence or presence of the LHRH agonist triptorelin (100 nM) or the antagonist Cetrorelix (100 nM) before the cells were stimulated for 10 min with EGF (100 nM). C-fos mRNA expression was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR using a synthetic DNA fragment as internal standard. C-Fos protein synthesis was determined by SDS-PAGE and semi-quantitative Western blotting.
RESULTS: In cells derived from endometrial and ovarian cancer, maximal c-fos mRNA expression (seven- to ninefold over basal level) was obtained 30 min after EGF stimulation. In the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 this effect was obtained 60 min after EGF treatment. In all of the lines expressing LHRH receptor, EGF-induced c-fos mRNA expression as well as c-Fos protein synthesis was dose-dependently reduced by treatment with LHRH agonists and antagonists. At 100 nM concentrations of the LHRH analogs, c-fos expression was reduced to baseline levels. No effect of LHRH analogs on EGF-induced c-fos expression was observed in the ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3, which does not express the LHRH receptor.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the binding of LHRH agonists and antagonists to their receptors inhibits the mitogenic signal transduction pathway of the EGF receptor in endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer cell lines. The coupling of both signal transduction systems mediates the antiproliferative effect of LHRH analogs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app