We have located links that may give you full text access.
Long-term outcome in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation.
Neurology 2000 June 28
OBJECTIVE: To analyze long-term recovery and predictors of outcome in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) requiring mechanical ventilation.
METHODS: The clinical and electrophysiologic data of 114 patients with GBS admitted to the intensive care unit between 1976 and 1996 (60 mechanically ventilated, 54 nonventilated) were reviewed. Functional disability and predictors of outcome were determined at 1 year and at maximal recovery using the Hughes scale. Good outcome was defined as ability to ambulate without assistance; poor outcome was defined as inability to ambulate independently.
RESULTS: Mechanical ventilation was required in 81% of patients with a poor outcome. Mortality was 20% in patients ventilated for GBS. However, ventilated patients who survived did well, with 79% eventually regaining independent ambulation. Nineteen percent of patients improved at least one functional grade beyond 1 year. Univariate predictors of poor maximal recovery in ventilated GBS patients were increased age (p < 0.001)), upper limb paralysis (p = 0.004), duration of ventilation (p = 0.006), and delay of more than 2 days to transfer to a tertiary center (p < 0.001). However, only age (OR 1.99, p = 0.004) and delayed transfer (OR 19.8, p = 0.002) were independently predictive of poor outcome on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Mechanically ventilated patients constitute the majority of GBS patients with a poor outcome, and mortality remains substantial in this subgroup (20%). Although recovery from severe GBS may be prolonged, most survivors regain independent ambulation.
METHODS: The clinical and electrophysiologic data of 114 patients with GBS admitted to the intensive care unit between 1976 and 1996 (60 mechanically ventilated, 54 nonventilated) were reviewed. Functional disability and predictors of outcome were determined at 1 year and at maximal recovery using the Hughes scale. Good outcome was defined as ability to ambulate without assistance; poor outcome was defined as inability to ambulate independently.
RESULTS: Mechanical ventilation was required in 81% of patients with a poor outcome. Mortality was 20% in patients ventilated for GBS. However, ventilated patients who survived did well, with 79% eventually regaining independent ambulation. Nineteen percent of patients improved at least one functional grade beyond 1 year. Univariate predictors of poor maximal recovery in ventilated GBS patients were increased age (p < 0.001)), upper limb paralysis (p = 0.004), duration of ventilation (p = 0.006), and delay of more than 2 days to transfer to a tertiary center (p < 0.001). However, only age (OR 1.99, p = 0.004) and delayed transfer (OR 19.8, p = 0.002) were independently predictive of poor outcome on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Mechanically ventilated patients constitute the majority of GBS patients with a poor outcome, and mortality remains substantial in this subgroup (20%). Although recovery from severe GBS may be prolonged, most survivors regain independent ambulation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app