A biomechanical study of Tang's multiple locking techniques for flexor tendon repair.

This study was designed to biomechanically compare Tang's multiple looped locking techniques with various suture techniques for flexor tendon repair in the hand. Fifty flexor digitorum profondus tendons taken from pig toes were used as models; The tendons were transected in the middle part of zone 2 defined as the area beneath bifurcation of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendons, and were repaired by five different suture methods: (1) modified Kessler, (2) Tsuge's suture, (3) double Kessler, (4) modified Kessler plus Tsuge, and (5) Tang's suture. The repaired tendons were placed in an Instron tensile testing machine to determine the tensile properties of the repair. 2 mm gap formation force and ultimate tensile strength were measured during the test. Maximal work to failure were calculated according to area under the load-displacement curve of the test. 2 mm gap formation force was 21.5 N for the Kessler, 20.6 N for the Tsuge, 31.6 N for double Kessler, 30.9 N for the Kessler plus Tsuge and 41.4 N for the Tang. Ultimate tensile strength was 23.5 N for the Kessler, 22.9 N for the Tsuge, 34.5 N for the Kessler plus Tsuge and 45.6 N for the Tang. Statistically, Tang's suture had the greatest gap formation force, ultimate strength and energy for failure among the five techniques (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). Gap formation force, ultimate strength and energy to failure for double Kessler or the Kessler plus Tsuge were significantly greater than those for the Kessler or the Tsuge (p < 0.05 or < 0.01). The tendons repaired by Tang's method tolerated a significantly higher tensile load (133 to 198% of the other techniques) than the other methods. Among the methods tested, Tang's multiple looped locking suture provides sufficient gap resistance and tensile strength that may be able to withstand early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair.