We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Barbiturates for acute traumatic brain injury.
BACKGROUND: Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important complication of severe brain injury, and is associated with a high mortality rate. Barbiturates are believed to reduce intracranial pressure by suppressing cerebral metabolism, thus reducing cerebral metabolic demands and cerebral blood volume. However, barbiturates also reduce blood pressure and therefore may adversely effect cerebral perfusion pressure.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of barbiturates in reducing raised intracranial pressure, mortality and morbidity in people with acute traumatic brain injury. To quantify any side effects resulting from the use of barbiturates.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The review draws largely on the search strategy developed for the Cochrane Injuries Group as a whole. However, in addition the Cochrane Library was searched in December 1996 using the text terms "barbiturate*," "pentobarb*," "phenobarb*," "head," and "brain." An updated search was done in April 1999.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi randomised trials of any one or more of the barbiturate class of drugs (amobarbital, barbital, hexobarbital, mephobarbital, methohexital, murexide, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, thiobarbiturate) where study participants had a clinically diagnosed acute traumatic brain injury of any severity.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewer extracted the data and assessed the quality of allocation concealment in the trials.
MAIN RESULTS: The pooled relative risk for death (barbiturate vs no barbiturate) was 1.09 (95%CI 0.81 to 1.47). The pooled effect of barbiturates on adverse neurological outcome, measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (death, persistent vegetative state or severe disability) was 1.15 (95% 0.81 to 1.64). Two studies examined the effect of barbiturate therapy on intracranial pressure. In the study by Eisenberger et al, a smaller proportion of patients in the barbiturate group had uncontrolled ICP (68% vs 83%). The relative risk for uncontrolled ICP was 0.81 (95%CI 0.62 to 1.06). Similarly, in the study by Ward et al, mean ICP was lower in the barbiturate treated group. Barbiturate therapy results in an increase in the occurrence of hypotension (RR=1.80 95%CI 1.19 to 2.70). For every four patients treated one will develop clinically significant hypotension. Mean body temperature was significantly lower in the barbiturate treated group. Schwartz et al compared pentobarbital with mannitol in the control of intracranial pressure. Pentobarbital was less effective than mannitol for control of raised ICP. 68% of patients in the pentobarbital treated group required a second drug for the treatment of raised intracranial pressure compared to 39% in the mannitol treated group (RR=1.75 95%CI 1.05 to 2.92). There was no substantial difference in mortality between the two study groups (RR=1.18 95%CI 0.73 to 1.92).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that barbiturate therapy in patients with acute severe head injury improves outcome. Barbiturate therapy results in a fall in blood pressure in 1 in 4 treated patients. The hypotensive effect of barbiturate therapy will offset any ICP lowering effect on cerebral perfusion pressure.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of barbiturates in reducing raised intracranial pressure, mortality and morbidity in people with acute traumatic brain injury. To quantify any side effects resulting from the use of barbiturates.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The review draws largely on the search strategy developed for the Cochrane Injuries Group as a whole. However, in addition the Cochrane Library was searched in December 1996 using the text terms "barbiturate*," "pentobarb*," "phenobarb*," "head," and "brain." An updated search was done in April 1999.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi randomised trials of any one or more of the barbiturate class of drugs (amobarbital, barbital, hexobarbital, mephobarbital, methohexital, murexide, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, thiobarbiturate) where study participants had a clinically diagnosed acute traumatic brain injury of any severity.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewer extracted the data and assessed the quality of allocation concealment in the trials.
MAIN RESULTS: The pooled relative risk for death (barbiturate vs no barbiturate) was 1.09 (95%CI 0.81 to 1.47). The pooled effect of barbiturates on adverse neurological outcome, measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (death, persistent vegetative state or severe disability) was 1.15 (95% 0.81 to 1.64). Two studies examined the effect of barbiturate therapy on intracranial pressure. In the study by Eisenberger et al, a smaller proportion of patients in the barbiturate group had uncontrolled ICP (68% vs 83%). The relative risk for uncontrolled ICP was 0.81 (95%CI 0.62 to 1.06). Similarly, in the study by Ward et al, mean ICP was lower in the barbiturate treated group. Barbiturate therapy results in an increase in the occurrence of hypotension (RR=1.80 95%CI 1.19 to 2.70). For every four patients treated one will develop clinically significant hypotension. Mean body temperature was significantly lower in the barbiturate treated group. Schwartz et al compared pentobarbital with mannitol in the control of intracranial pressure. Pentobarbital was less effective than mannitol for control of raised ICP. 68% of patients in the pentobarbital treated group required a second drug for the treatment of raised intracranial pressure compared to 39% in the mannitol treated group (RR=1.75 95%CI 1.05 to 2.92). There was no substantial difference in mortality between the two study groups (RR=1.18 95%CI 0.73 to 1.92).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that barbiturate therapy in patients with acute severe head injury improves outcome. Barbiturate therapy results in a fall in blood pressure in 1 in 4 treated patients. The hypotensive effect of barbiturate therapy will offset any ICP lowering effect on cerebral perfusion pressure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app