We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks.
BACKGROUND: People with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation who have had a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke are at risk of recurrent stroke.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare the effect of anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy, for secondary prevention, in people with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and previous cerebral ischaemia.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The reviewer searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register and contacted trialists.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral anticoagulants with aspirin in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and a previous transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted the data.
MAIN RESULTS: One trial was included, involving 455 patients. They received either anticoagulants (International Normalised Ratio 2.5 to 4.0), or 300 milligrams of aspirin per day. People joined the trial within three months of transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. The mean follow-up was 2.3 years. Anticoagulant therapy approximately halved the odds of serious vascular events (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0. 83). This equates to preventing an extra 50 vascular events per year for every 1000 patients treated. Anticoagulant therapy decreased the odds of recurrent stroke by two-thirds (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.59). This translates to preventing an extra 60 strokes for every 1000 patients treated per year. Major extracranial bleeds occurred more often in patients given anticoagulants (odds ratio 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 12.99). The absolute difference was 2.8% versus 0.9% bleeds per year. None of the patients on anticoagulants and one on aspirin had an intracerebral bleed.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from one trial suggests that anticoagulant therapy can benefit people with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischaemia. Aspirin may be a useful alternative if there is a contraindication to anticoagulant therapy. The risk of adverse events appears to be higher with anticoagulant therapy than aspirin.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare the effect of anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy, for secondary prevention, in people with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and previous cerebral ischaemia.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The reviewer searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register and contacted trialists.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral anticoagulants with aspirin in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and a previous transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted the data.
MAIN RESULTS: One trial was included, involving 455 patients. They received either anticoagulants (International Normalised Ratio 2.5 to 4.0), or 300 milligrams of aspirin per day. People joined the trial within three months of transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. The mean follow-up was 2.3 years. Anticoagulant therapy approximately halved the odds of serious vascular events (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0. 83). This equates to preventing an extra 50 vascular events per year for every 1000 patients treated. Anticoagulant therapy decreased the odds of recurrent stroke by two-thirds (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.59). This translates to preventing an extra 60 strokes for every 1000 patients treated per year. Major extracranial bleeds occurred more often in patients given anticoagulants (odds ratio 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 12.99). The absolute difference was 2.8% versus 0.9% bleeds per year. None of the patients on anticoagulants and one on aspirin had an intracerebral bleed.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from one trial suggests that anticoagulant therapy can benefit people with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischaemia. Aspirin may be a useful alternative if there is a contraindication to anticoagulant therapy. The risk of adverse events appears to be higher with anticoagulant therapy than aspirin.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app