We have located links that may give you full text access.
Periurethral collagen injection for stress incontinence with and without urethral hypermobility.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000 March
OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of periurethral collagen injection in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women with and without urethral hypermobility.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 60 periurethral collagen injections performed on 40 consecutive women from January 1996 to December 1997. A review of the office chart and operative notes was performed to obtain demographic, urodynamic, and procedural data. Outcome data were obtained by personal or telephone interview, using patients' subjective assessments including an analog satisfaction scale.
RESULTS: Nine of 40 patients (23%) had urethral hypermobility. Compared with patients without hypermobility, patients with hypermobility required a similar number of procedures (a mean of 1.9 compared with 1.4, P = .13) and required similar amounts of collagen on the first injection (5.6 mL compared with 5.3 mL, P = .69). Preoperative urodynamic parameters were similar in both groups. Rates of subjective dryness were equivalent in patients with and without hypermobility at 1 month (76% and 46%, P = .24) and at 6 months (71% and 32%, P = .09) following initial injection. A post hoc power analysis was performed to evaluate the primary study measures of continence at 1 and 6 months, and number of collagen injections. This revealed that a sample size of 40 patients would be sufficient to detect a 2.5-fold difference in number of injections and a 3-fold difference in subjective dryness.
CONCLUSION: Coexisting urethral hypermobility should not preclude the use of collagen injections in women with stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 60 periurethral collagen injections performed on 40 consecutive women from January 1996 to December 1997. A review of the office chart and operative notes was performed to obtain demographic, urodynamic, and procedural data. Outcome data were obtained by personal or telephone interview, using patients' subjective assessments including an analog satisfaction scale.
RESULTS: Nine of 40 patients (23%) had urethral hypermobility. Compared with patients without hypermobility, patients with hypermobility required a similar number of procedures (a mean of 1.9 compared with 1.4, P = .13) and required similar amounts of collagen on the first injection (5.6 mL compared with 5.3 mL, P = .69). Preoperative urodynamic parameters were similar in both groups. Rates of subjective dryness were equivalent in patients with and without hypermobility at 1 month (76% and 46%, P = .24) and at 6 months (71% and 32%, P = .09) following initial injection. A post hoc power analysis was performed to evaluate the primary study measures of continence at 1 and 6 months, and number of collagen injections. This revealed that a sample size of 40 patients would be sufficient to detect a 2.5-fold difference in number of injections and a 3-fold difference in subjective dryness.
CONCLUSION: Coexisting urethral hypermobility should not preclude the use of collagen injections in women with stress urinary incontinence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app