JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Beliefs about diagnosing asthma in young children.
Pediatrics 2000 March
OBJECTIVES: To determine what factors primary care pediatricians believe are important in establishing the initial diagnosis of childhood asthma and to identify variations in physicians' beliefs concerning this clinical decision.
STUDY DESIGN: Massachusetts American Academy of Pediatrics Fellows were surveyed about their beliefs concerning the importance of 20 clinical factors associated with establishing the initial diagnosis of asthma.
RESULTS: Most clinicians considered recurrent wheeze (96%), symptomatic improvement with a bronchodilator (90%), recurrent cough (89%), exclusion of alternative diagnoses (87%), and suggestive peak flow findings (82%) as important in diagnosing asthma. However, there was substantial heterogeneity among clinicians as to which combinations of factors they each considered relevant; for example, only 60% identified all 5 of the above factors to be necessary or important. Further, <50% identified presence of any of the 20 factors as necessary. Although national guidelines cite objective assessment of pulmonary function as essential, spirometry and peak expiratory flow testing were identified as necessary by only 8% and 10%, respectively. Two factors believed to contribute to establishing the asthma diagnosis contradicted the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines and expert opinion (age >2 years and absence of fever during episodes) and these beliefs were more likely held by those clinicians in practice for >5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatricians believe several common clinical factors establish a diagnosis of childhood asthma, but disagree over what combinations of these factors are important. Some misconceptions persist despite wide dissemination of clinical practice guidelines. We believe that future asthma guidelines will need to organize diagnostic criteria in an easily understood format, like a decision tree, to facilitate early recognition of asthma in young children.
STUDY DESIGN: Massachusetts American Academy of Pediatrics Fellows were surveyed about their beliefs concerning the importance of 20 clinical factors associated with establishing the initial diagnosis of asthma.
RESULTS: Most clinicians considered recurrent wheeze (96%), symptomatic improvement with a bronchodilator (90%), recurrent cough (89%), exclusion of alternative diagnoses (87%), and suggestive peak flow findings (82%) as important in diagnosing asthma. However, there was substantial heterogeneity among clinicians as to which combinations of factors they each considered relevant; for example, only 60% identified all 5 of the above factors to be necessary or important. Further, <50% identified presence of any of the 20 factors as necessary. Although national guidelines cite objective assessment of pulmonary function as essential, spirometry and peak expiratory flow testing were identified as necessary by only 8% and 10%, respectively. Two factors believed to contribute to establishing the asthma diagnosis contradicted the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines and expert opinion (age >2 years and absence of fever during episodes) and these beliefs were more likely held by those clinicians in practice for >5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatricians believe several common clinical factors establish a diagnosis of childhood asthma, but disagree over what combinations of these factors are important. Some misconceptions persist despite wide dissemination of clinical practice guidelines. We believe that future asthma guidelines will need to organize diagnostic criteria in an easily understood format, like a decision tree, to facilitate early recognition of asthma in young children.
Full text links
Trending Papers
How to improve the efficiency and the safety of real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in 2023: a narrative review.Annals of Intensive Care 2023 May 26
SGLT2 Inhibitors: A New Therapeutical Strategy to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023 May 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app