We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
The effects of tramadol versus fentanyl in attenuating hemodynamic response following tracheal intubation.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Sinica 1999 December
BACKGROUND: Tramadol is a novel central acting analgesic. It has been used as a complement to general anesthesia and an effective agent for postoperative analgesia. However, the influence of tramadol on the hemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation is less known.
METHODS: Forty patients of both sexes, 16-50 year old, ASA physical status I or II, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into equal groups in this prospective, double blind study. After obtaining the baseline data, the patient was given 3 micrograms/kg fentanyl (Group F) or 3 mg/kg tramadol (Group T). Then induction of anesthesia in a uniform and standardized manner was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was blind to the medication. The hemodynamic parameters were measured and recorded immediately after induction but prior to laryngoscopy, 3, 6, and 9 min after intubation, and before incision. We also observed any unusual effect in the postoperative care unit. Chi-square test, Student's t-test and paired t-test were used for statistical comparison. A P less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: All patients had a successful induction and intubation. Differences in baseline values were not significant, nor were the differences in the values following induction. After laryngoscopy and intubation, heart rate increased significantly above the baseline level in both groups. The increase of heart rate was significantly more at 6 and 9 min (P < 0.05) and lasted longer in the tramadol group. After intubation, systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressure (SAP, MAP, DAP) increased significantly above baseline in both groups too, except for DAP in fentanyl group. At 6 and 9 min, the MAP and DAP were significantly higher in tramadol than in fentanyl group (P < 0.05). Six patients in tramadol group had mild pain on injection of tramadol.
CONCLUSIONS: When administered right before thiopental induction, 3 mg/kg tramadol did not display a better attenuation against the increase of hemodynamic profiles than did 3 micrograms/kg fentanyl following tracheal intubation.
METHODS: Forty patients of both sexes, 16-50 year old, ASA physical status I or II, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into equal groups in this prospective, double blind study. After obtaining the baseline data, the patient was given 3 micrograms/kg fentanyl (Group F) or 3 mg/kg tramadol (Group T). Then induction of anesthesia in a uniform and standardized manner was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was blind to the medication. The hemodynamic parameters were measured and recorded immediately after induction but prior to laryngoscopy, 3, 6, and 9 min after intubation, and before incision. We also observed any unusual effect in the postoperative care unit. Chi-square test, Student's t-test and paired t-test were used for statistical comparison. A P less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: All patients had a successful induction and intubation. Differences in baseline values were not significant, nor were the differences in the values following induction. After laryngoscopy and intubation, heart rate increased significantly above the baseline level in both groups. The increase of heart rate was significantly more at 6 and 9 min (P < 0.05) and lasted longer in the tramadol group. After intubation, systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressure (SAP, MAP, DAP) increased significantly above baseline in both groups too, except for DAP in fentanyl group. At 6 and 9 min, the MAP and DAP were significantly higher in tramadol than in fentanyl group (P < 0.05). Six patients in tramadol group had mild pain on injection of tramadol.
CONCLUSIONS: When administered right before thiopental induction, 3 mg/kg tramadol did not display a better attenuation against the increase of hemodynamic profiles than did 3 micrograms/kg fentanyl following tracheal intubation.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app