OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Measures of postural stability are not predictors of recovery from large postural disturbances in healthy older adults

T M Owings, M J Pavol, K T Foley, M D Grabiner
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2000, 48 (1): 42-50
10642020

OBJECTIVES: To determine, in healthy older adults, the relationship between postural steadiness, stability limits, and the ability to recover balance from three postural disturbances requiring anteriorly directed stepping responses.

DESIGN: Analysis of multiple motor tasks in a cross-sectional sample of healthy older adults.

SETTING: A biomechanics research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS: Fifty women and 29 men aged 65 or older, all healthy, living in the community, participated in this study. Subjects were examined by a geriatrician to identify the presence of exclusionary factors.

MEASUREMENTS: Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral excursion distances of the center of pressure during quiet standing (postural steadiness), static leaning (static stability limits), and dynamic swaying (dynamic stability limits) were determined from ground reaction forces measured by a strain gauge forceplate. Within the same group of subjects, the maximum angle of forward lean from which a subject could recover with a single step, the ability to recover balance in response to an accelerated support surface, and the ability to recover balance after being tripped were determined.

RESULTS: Recovery from the three types of postural disturbances were found to be statistically independent. The postural steadiness and the stability limit variables were only weakly correlated. Postural steadiness and stability limits were not related to the maximum recoverable angle of lean. The average medial-lateral center of pressure speed during the postural steadiness test was significantly slower for those who failed to recover after tripping than for the subjects who recovered successfully. However, a logistic regression model failed to achieve statistical significance, suggesting that the difference may not be functionally important. The anterior-posterior static stability limits were significantly larger for subjects who recovered successfully than for those who failed to recover during the accelerated support surface test. Although logistic regression suggested that a reduced anterior-posterior stability limit represents a risk factor for failure to recover during this task, only nine of 28 failures could be properly classified, thus diminishing the functional importance of this finding.

CONCLUSIONS: Because recovery following postural disturbances could not generally be predicted from measures of postural stability, these findings suggest that these measures of postural stability are of limited utility in identifying potential anteriorly directed fallers in healthy older adults.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
10642020
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"