We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
[Diffusion in bone tissue of antibiotics].
La Presse Médicale 1999 December 19
DIFFICULT ASSESSMENT: Bone and joint infections are difficult to treat. Therapeutic success depends greatly on the diffusion of antibiotics into bone tissue. Few studies have been devoted to this subject and the variable nature of those reported hinders interpretation. Bone biopsies are generally obtained during orthopedic procedures. Antibiotic administration routes vary although intravenous infusion predominates. Agar gel diffusion is generally used for antibiotic assays but methodology varies depending of the study. The most recent reports use high-performance liquid chromatography. DIFFUSION STUDIES: The different studies examining antibiotic diffusion in bone tissue describe three classes: good diffusion (greater than 30%), moderate diffusion (between 15% and 30%), and low diffusion (less than 15%). Antibiotics in the good diffusion class include fluoroquinolones, teicoplanin, macrolides, rifampicin and trimethoprime. Antibiotics with moderate bone diffusion are ureidopenicillins, second and third generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, clindamycin, fosfomycin and vancomycin. Those with low bone diffusion are aminopenicillins, penicillin M and first generation cephalosporins. No data is available on the bone diffusion of pristinamycin. DATA INTERPRETATION: The clinical impact of these classifications must be interpreted with precaution when considering bone and joint infections as they were established on the basis of pharmacokinetic studies and not clinical trials. They would however appear to be useful in guiding antibiotic prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery in protocols with administration conditions and concentration goals similar to the experimental conditions. PRACTICAL ATTITUDES: These laboratory results could be used in clinical practice by comparing the MIC50 of the germs regularly encountered in bone infections (staphylococci, streptococci including enterococci, Gram negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae) with concentrations obtained in the different studies, i.e. by calculating the inhibitor coefficient (IQ) of each antibiotic for each susceptible germ. This gives a classification by efficacy (excellent IQ > 10, good 1 < IQ < 10, poor IQ < 1) useful for guiding antibiotic choice in the difficult situation of bone and joint infection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app