We have located links that may give you full text access.
Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight with and without oligohydramnios. A case-control study.
Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1999 November
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight among women with and without oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index [AFI] < or = 5.0 cm) and to ascertain the ability to detect fetal growth restriction (FGR) (estimated birth weight < 10th percentile for gestational age [GA]) among patients in two groups.
STUDY DESIGN: Assuming that 50% of sonographic predictions are within 10% of the birth weight in the study group, 300 parturients are necessary to show a difference of 15% among controls (alpha = .05, beta = .02). The study group consisted of parturients with a reliable GA of > or = 24, no known anomalies and known AFI of < or = 5.0 cm. The control (1:1) was the next patient with the same GA but AFI between 5.1 and 23.9 cm. The paired t test was used, and the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. P < .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Among the study and control groups (N = 162 each), maternal demographics, mean estimate (P = .078) and actual birth weight (P = .091) were similar. Sonographic estimates within 10% of weight were not significantly different among those with (57%) and without oligohydramnios (59%; OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.59, 1.44). The frequency of FGR was higher among those with inadequate fluid (18%) than controls (9%; OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.10, 4.16). Sensitivity, positive predictive value and likelihood ratio were higher among those with oligohydramnios (76%, 78% and 16) than controls (53%, 42% and 7).
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight is not influenced by whether the parturient has oligohydramnios. Moreover, the accuracy of identifying FGR is not diminished among those with AFI < or = 5.0 versus > 5.0 cm.
STUDY DESIGN: Assuming that 50% of sonographic predictions are within 10% of the birth weight in the study group, 300 parturients are necessary to show a difference of 15% among controls (alpha = .05, beta = .02). The study group consisted of parturients with a reliable GA of > or = 24, no known anomalies and known AFI of < or = 5.0 cm. The control (1:1) was the next patient with the same GA but AFI between 5.1 and 23.9 cm. The paired t test was used, and the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. P < .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Among the study and control groups (N = 162 each), maternal demographics, mean estimate (P = .078) and actual birth weight (P = .091) were similar. Sonographic estimates within 10% of weight were not significantly different among those with (57%) and without oligohydramnios (59%; OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.59, 1.44). The frequency of FGR was higher among those with inadequate fluid (18%) than controls (9%; OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.10, 4.16). Sensitivity, positive predictive value and likelihood ratio were higher among those with oligohydramnios (76%, 78% and 16) than controls (53%, 42% and 7).
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of sonographic estimates of fetal weight is not influenced by whether the parturient has oligohydramnios. Moreover, the accuracy of identifying FGR is not diminished among those with AFI < or = 5.0 versus > 5.0 cm.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app