We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Treatment of diaphyseal femoral fractures in children: a clinical study].
Annales de Chirurgie 1999
UNLABELLED: Many therapeutic modalities have been reported for the management of femoral shaft fractures in children and young adolescents but there is no consensus on the preferable method.
PURPOSE: To compare the malunion rate of femoral shaft fractures in children treated either by traction and spica cast or traction and functional brace.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 1984 a prospective study was carried out in a tertiary pediatric university hospital on 43 patients (24 boys, 19 girls) with a closed femoral shaft fracture. The patient's age ranged from 5 to 13 years old. Open, pathologic, subtrochanteric and physeal fractures were excluded. Fifteen (15) patients were treated by a functional brace and 28 were treated by a spica cast. Clinical and radiological assessments of all patients were performed 5 years or more after the fracture by an independent observer. A malunion occurred if one of these criteria were met: an angulation > or = 10 degrees in the coronal plane, an angulation > or = 15 degrees in the sagittal plane, a malrotation > or = 15 degrees by opposition to the other leg, and a discrepancy > or = 10 mm between femur's length.
RESULTS: A malunion was found in 17 patients, 6 in the functional brace and 11 in the spica cast group (p > 0.05). The leg length discrepancy was the most common type of malunion. The length of stay was not significantly different between both treatment groups. The functional brace was worn longer than the spica cast.
CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference between the malunion rate of children treated by traction-spica cast and traction-functional brace. The functional brace appears to be a good alternative for the treatment for femoral shaft fracture in children allowing an earlier ambulation than spica cast.
PURPOSE: To compare the malunion rate of femoral shaft fractures in children treated either by traction and spica cast or traction and functional brace.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 1984 a prospective study was carried out in a tertiary pediatric university hospital on 43 patients (24 boys, 19 girls) with a closed femoral shaft fracture. The patient's age ranged from 5 to 13 years old. Open, pathologic, subtrochanteric and physeal fractures were excluded. Fifteen (15) patients were treated by a functional brace and 28 were treated by a spica cast. Clinical and radiological assessments of all patients were performed 5 years or more after the fracture by an independent observer. A malunion occurred if one of these criteria were met: an angulation > or = 10 degrees in the coronal plane, an angulation > or = 15 degrees in the sagittal plane, a malrotation > or = 15 degrees by opposition to the other leg, and a discrepancy > or = 10 mm between femur's length.
RESULTS: A malunion was found in 17 patients, 6 in the functional brace and 11 in the spica cast group (p > 0.05). The leg length discrepancy was the most common type of malunion. The length of stay was not significantly different between both treatment groups. The functional brace was worn longer than the spica cast.
CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference between the malunion rate of children treated by traction-spica cast and traction-functional brace. The functional brace appears to be a good alternative for the treatment for femoral shaft fracture in children allowing an earlier ambulation than spica cast.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app