We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
The cost-effectiveness of treating all patients with type 2 diabetes with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Annals of Internal Medicine 1999 November 3
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for diabetic patients with microalbuminuria, this strategy requires that providers adhere to screening recommendations. In addition, the benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in normoalbuminuric patients was recently demonstrated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating all patients with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN: Markov model simulating the progression of diabetic nephropathy.
DATA SOURCES: Randomized trials estimating the progression of diabetic nephropathy with and without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
TARGET POPULATION: Patients 50 years of age with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose level > or = 7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL]).
TIME HORIZON: Lifetime.
PERSPECTIVE: Societal.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, screening for microalbuminuria, or screening for gross proteinuria.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and marginal cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Screening for gross proteinuria had the highest cost and the lowest benefit. Compared with screening for microalbuminuria, treating all patients was more expensive ($15240 and $14940 per patient) but was associated with increased quality-adjusted life expectancy (11.82 and 11.78 quality-adjusted life-years). The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio was $7500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Results were sensitive to the cost, effectiveness, and quality of life associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, as well as age at diagnosis. The model was relatively insensitive to adherence with screening and costs of treating end-stage renal disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating all middle-aged diabetic patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is a simple strategy that provides additional benefit at modest additional cost. The strategy assumes that patients meet the older diagnostic criteria for diabetes and makes sense only for those who are not bothered by treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating all patients with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN: Markov model simulating the progression of diabetic nephropathy.
DATA SOURCES: Randomized trials estimating the progression of diabetic nephropathy with and without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
TARGET POPULATION: Patients 50 years of age with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose level > or = 7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL]).
TIME HORIZON: Lifetime.
PERSPECTIVE: Societal.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, screening for microalbuminuria, or screening for gross proteinuria.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life expectancy, and marginal cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Screening for gross proteinuria had the highest cost and the lowest benefit. Compared with screening for microalbuminuria, treating all patients was more expensive ($15240 and $14940 per patient) but was associated with increased quality-adjusted life expectancy (11.82 and 11.78 quality-adjusted life-years). The marginal cost-effectiveness ratio was $7500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Results were sensitive to the cost, effectiveness, and quality of life associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, as well as age at diagnosis. The model was relatively insensitive to adherence with screening and costs of treating end-stage renal disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating all middle-aged diabetic patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is a simple strategy that provides additional benefit at modest additional cost. The strategy assumes that patients meet the older diagnostic criteria for diabetes and makes sense only for those who are not bothered by treatment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app