JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Forty-one years of surgical experience with congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Several techniques for symmetric reconstruction of the aortic root in congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis have been developed, but it remains unclear whether these prove superior to patch enlargement of the noncoronary sinus alone. We reviewed our experience with surgical treatment of supravalvular aortic stenosis and investigated the impact of the surgical technique on long-term results.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent operations to treat congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis at our institution between 1957 and 1998. Surgical procedures included patch enlargement of the noncoronary sinus only (n = 34), inverted bifurcated patch plasty (n = 35), and 3-sinus reconstruction of the aortic root (n = 6). There were 7 early deaths. Among those who survived the operation, 100% were alive at 5 years, 96% were alive at 10 years, and 77% were alive at 20 years. According to time-related analysis diffuse stenosis of the ascending aorta proved a risk factor for both survival and reoperation (P <.01 for each). Patients with multiple-sinus reconstructions of the aortic root accounted for only 2 of the 14 reoperations and none of the late deaths (both P <.001). Residual gradients were lower after multiple-sinus reconstruction of the aortic root (median 10 mm Hg vs 20 mm Hg for patch enlargement of the noncoronary sinus only, P =. 008), as was the prevalence of moderate aortic regurgitation at follow-up (3% vs 22%, P =.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Results of operations for supravalvular aortic stenosis improved greatly after the introduction of more symmetric reconstructions of the aortic root. Multiple-sinus reconstructions (inverted bifurcated patch plasty and 3-sinus reconstruction) resulted in superior hemodynamics and were associated with reductions in both mortality rate and need for reoperation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app