We have located links that may give you full text access.
Foot landing position during gait influences ground reaction forces.
Clinical Biomechanics 1999 July
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how foot landing position influenced the ground reaction forces of two coordinate systems during gait.
DESIGN: Values of ground reaction forces components as expressed in two coordinate systems (room, foot) were used to compare ground reaction forces of different foot landing position.
BACKGROUND: Non-neutral foot landing position during gait could influence the mechanics of the whole body motion and/or the foot-ankle complex and produce different ground reaction forces patterns compared to a neutral foot landing position.
METHODS: Thirty females were assigned to a foot landing group: toe-out, toe-in or neutral. Each participant walked 10 trials across a force platform while three-dimensional motion was captured.
RESULTS: No differences were observed for vertical or anteroposterior ground reaction forces variables between groups for either coordinate system. For medio-lateral forces of both coordinate systems, toe-out participants exhibited greater first lateral and second medial maximum forces and exhibited greater impulses.
CONCLUSION: For toe-out participants, greater medio-lateral ground reaction forces of the room coordinate system indicate excessive forces are generated by toe-out participants that do not contribute to moving the participant forward. Furthermore, medio-lateral loading on the foot increases proportionally with the degree of toe-out.
RELEVANCE: Establishing norms for clinical populations requires understanding of factors that can influence ground reaction force (GRF). Foot landing position (FLP) only affects the medio-lateral forces. Excessive toe-out landing has been surmised to be related to injury. Greater forces acting medio-laterally to the foot's long axis may have a relevant effect on in/eversion loading of the foot.
DESIGN: Values of ground reaction forces components as expressed in two coordinate systems (room, foot) were used to compare ground reaction forces of different foot landing position.
BACKGROUND: Non-neutral foot landing position during gait could influence the mechanics of the whole body motion and/or the foot-ankle complex and produce different ground reaction forces patterns compared to a neutral foot landing position.
METHODS: Thirty females were assigned to a foot landing group: toe-out, toe-in or neutral. Each participant walked 10 trials across a force platform while three-dimensional motion was captured.
RESULTS: No differences were observed for vertical or anteroposterior ground reaction forces variables between groups for either coordinate system. For medio-lateral forces of both coordinate systems, toe-out participants exhibited greater first lateral and second medial maximum forces and exhibited greater impulses.
CONCLUSION: For toe-out participants, greater medio-lateral ground reaction forces of the room coordinate system indicate excessive forces are generated by toe-out participants that do not contribute to moving the participant forward. Furthermore, medio-lateral loading on the foot increases proportionally with the degree of toe-out.
RELEVANCE: Establishing norms for clinical populations requires understanding of factors that can influence ground reaction force (GRF). Foot landing position (FLP) only affects the medio-lateral forces. Excessive toe-out landing has been surmised to be related to injury. Greater forces acting medio-laterally to the foot's long axis may have a relevant effect on in/eversion loading of the foot.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app