We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 1999 September
OBJECTIVE: The few papers published on the use of sonography in carpal tunnel syndrome suggest it may be a useful diagnostic test. This study aims to prospectively evaluate the use of sonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with documented carpal tunnel syndrome and a group of asymptomatic control subjects were enrolled and underwent high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel. A small-footprint linear array transducer was used to scan and measure the median nerve cross-sectional area and the maximum transverse and anteroposterior diameters. Data from the patient group and the control group were compared to establish optimal diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight carpal tunnel syndrome patients (50 women, 18 men) with 102 affected nerves and 68 nerves in 36 asymptomatic controls (23 women, 13 men) were examined. Qualitative assessment alone was found to be unreliable. All measurements showed significant differences between patients and controls. The most predictive measurement was swelling of the median nerve, which was significantly greater in carpal tunnel syndrome patients compared with controls (mean, 0.13 cm2 versus 0.07 cm2). Thus, quantitative assessment of the median nerve provides an accurate diagnostic test (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 97%), with an area larger than 0.09 cm2 being highly predictive of carpal tunnel syndrome.
CONCLUSION: We confirm that median nerve cross-sectional area measurement correlates well with the presence of carpal tunnel syndrome and is both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with documented carpal tunnel syndrome and a group of asymptomatic control subjects were enrolled and underwent high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel. A small-footprint linear array transducer was used to scan and measure the median nerve cross-sectional area and the maximum transverse and anteroposterior diameters. Data from the patient group and the control group were compared to establish optimal diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight carpal tunnel syndrome patients (50 women, 18 men) with 102 affected nerves and 68 nerves in 36 asymptomatic controls (23 women, 13 men) were examined. Qualitative assessment alone was found to be unreliable. All measurements showed significant differences between patients and controls. The most predictive measurement was swelling of the median nerve, which was significantly greater in carpal tunnel syndrome patients compared with controls (mean, 0.13 cm2 versus 0.07 cm2). Thus, quantitative assessment of the median nerve provides an accurate diagnostic test (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 97%), with an area larger than 0.09 cm2 being highly predictive of carpal tunnel syndrome.
CONCLUSION: We confirm that median nerve cross-sectional area measurement correlates well with the presence of carpal tunnel syndrome and is both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app