We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Mild or moderate hypothermia but not increased oxygen breathing prolongs survival during lethal uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in rats, with monitoring of visceral dysoxia.
Critical Care Medicine 1999 August
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that during lethal uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS) in rats compared with normothermia and room air breathing: a) mild hypothermia would prolong survival time as well as moderate hypothermia; b) oxygen breathing would prolong survival further; and c) hypothermia and oxygen would mitigate visceral ischemia (dysoxia) during UHS.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled laboratory animal study.
SETTING: Animal research facility.
SUBJECTS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats.
INTERVENTION: Fifty-four rats were lightly anesthetized with halothane during spontaneous breathing. UHS was induced by blood withdrawal of 3 mL/100 g over 15 mins, followed by 75% tail amputation with topical application of heparin. Five minutes after tail cut, rats were randomly divided into nine groups (6 rats each) with three rectal temperature levels (38 degrees C [100.4 degrees F; normothermia] vs. 34 degrees C [93.2 degrees F; mild hypothermia] vs. 30 degrees C [86 degrees F; moderate hypothermia]) by surface cooling; each with 3 FIO2 levels (0.25 vs. 0.5 vs. 1.0). Rats were observed without fluid resuscitation until death (apnea and pulselessness). Visceral ischemia was monitored by observing liver and gut surface PCO2.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean survival time, which was 51 mins in the control group with normothermia and FIO2 of 0.25, was more than doubled with hypothermia, to 119 mins in the combined mild hypothermia groups (p < .05) and to 132 mins in the combined moderate hypothermia groups (p < .05; NS for moderate vs. mild hypothermia). FIO2 had no statistically significant effect on survival time. Increases in visceral surface PCO2 correlated with hypotension (r2 = .22 for intestine and .40 for liver). Transiently, increased FIO2, not hypothermia, mitigated visceral ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Both mild and moderate hypothermia prolonged survival time during untreated, lethal UHS in rats. Increased FIO2 had no effect on survival. The effects of hypothermia and increased FIO2 during UHS on viscera, the ability to be resuscitated, and outcome should be explored further.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled laboratory animal study.
SETTING: Animal research facility.
SUBJECTS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats.
INTERVENTION: Fifty-four rats were lightly anesthetized with halothane during spontaneous breathing. UHS was induced by blood withdrawal of 3 mL/100 g over 15 mins, followed by 75% tail amputation with topical application of heparin. Five minutes after tail cut, rats were randomly divided into nine groups (6 rats each) with three rectal temperature levels (38 degrees C [100.4 degrees F; normothermia] vs. 34 degrees C [93.2 degrees F; mild hypothermia] vs. 30 degrees C [86 degrees F; moderate hypothermia]) by surface cooling; each with 3 FIO2 levels (0.25 vs. 0.5 vs. 1.0). Rats were observed without fluid resuscitation until death (apnea and pulselessness). Visceral ischemia was monitored by observing liver and gut surface PCO2.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean survival time, which was 51 mins in the control group with normothermia and FIO2 of 0.25, was more than doubled with hypothermia, to 119 mins in the combined mild hypothermia groups (p < .05) and to 132 mins in the combined moderate hypothermia groups (p < .05; NS for moderate vs. mild hypothermia). FIO2 had no statistically significant effect on survival time. Increases in visceral surface PCO2 correlated with hypotension (r2 = .22 for intestine and .40 for liver). Transiently, increased FIO2, not hypothermia, mitigated visceral ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Both mild and moderate hypothermia prolonged survival time during untreated, lethal UHS in rats. Increased FIO2 had no effect on survival. The effects of hypothermia and increased FIO2 during UHS on viscera, the ability to be resuscitated, and outcome should be explored further.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app