Measurement of maximal oxygen uptake from two different laboratory protocols in runners and squash players.

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to assess whether different test protocols used to elicit maximal oxygen uptake values (VO2max) attain similar results, whether different VO2max protocols were preferable for different athletic groups, and to assess whether the noninvasive criteria used to indicate the attainment of VO2max are achieved similarly in different VO2max testing protocols.

METHODS: This study evaluated the attainment of either VO2max or peak VO2 (VO2peak) during two treadmill VO2max protocols: a progressive speed protocol (PSP) and a progressive incline protocol (PIP). Ten runners and 10 squash players were studied to assess whether achievement of VO2max criteria was either sport-specific or protocol-specific, or both.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the VO2peak values reached in either PSP or PIP protocol (64.4 +/- 5.9 vs 66.5 +/- 6.0 mLO2 x kg(-1) x min(-1)). But HRmax (196 +/- 5 vs 189 +/- 5 beats x min(-1); PSP vs PIP; P < 0.01) and RER (1.14 +/- 0.05 vs 1.07 +/- 0.04; PSP vs PIP; P < 0.01) were significantly higher during the PSP test. Fifty percent of the subjects reached a plateau in either test, and of these subjects, 90% satisfied the three noninvasive criteria for VO2max in the PSP group, compared with 10% in the PIP group.

CONCLUSIONS: The indirect criteria used to assess the attainment of VO2max may be limited, as the VO2peak values were higher in the PIP protocol compared with the PSP protocol, although not significantly different, whereas the HR and RER values were significantly lower in the PIP than PSP protocol. Furthermore, only 50% of subjects demonstrated the plateau phenomenon in oxygen uptake with either protocol. It may be concluded that the measured physiological variables coinciding with VO2peak may differ when different protocols are used to elicit VO2max.