We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Endotracheal complications after long-term ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation in chronic thoracic diseases as an alternative to tracheostomy].
Medizinische Klinik 1999 April
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this present retrospective study we examined 62 long-term ventilated patients, whose weaning from respirator failed, for endoscopic airway complications and the frequency of consecutive surgery required. Furthermore noninvasive volume-controlled intermittent ventilation was evaluated as an alternative method to tracheostomy for maintaining mechanical ventilation and weaning of patients with chest wall disorders, neuromuscular and chronic obstructive lung disease.
RESULTS: 25 patients with endotracheal tube and 37 with tracheostomy who had been long-term ventilated in different intensive care units for 18 +/- 12 respectively 57 +/- 27 days (19 +/- 12 days via endotracheal tube) could be weaned successfully consequently using a volume-controlled intermittent ventilation via an individually adapted face mask. We found 2 patients of the group with endotracheal intubation (median age 59 +/- 15 years, 11 female, 14 male, median duration of mechanical ventilation via tube 18 +/- 12 days) to have visible injuries of the respiratory tract without consecutive surgery being necessary. All of them were successfully weaned from respirator via noninvasive ventilation (in 2 of them completely spontaneous breathing was re-established, 23 patients needed intermittent ventilation at home). Of the 37 patients with tracheostomy (median age 59 +/- 15 years, 15 female, 22 male, median duration of mechanical ventilation 57 +/- 27 days, tracheostomy on day 19 +/- 12) 19 cases (51%) showed endoscopically visible injuries of the respiratory tract of whom 7 cases (19%) were severe and made consecutive surgery necessary. 29 patients were discharged with noninvasive ventilation at home, 5 needed further invasive ventilation via tracheostomy and 3 patients breathed spontaneously without ventilatory support. The incidence of severe tracheal stenosis following long-term ventilation via tracheostomy was nearly 20% (1 tracheoesophageal fistula) and needed surgical treatment.
CONCLUSION: As even duration of ventilation via tracheal tube and mode of ventilation before transfer to our clinic was comparable in both groups noninvasive ventilation is an appropriate alternative to tracheostomy following endotracheal intubation for maintaining ventilatory support, especially for patients with chronic ventilatory insufficiency.
RESULTS: 25 patients with endotracheal tube and 37 with tracheostomy who had been long-term ventilated in different intensive care units for 18 +/- 12 respectively 57 +/- 27 days (19 +/- 12 days via endotracheal tube) could be weaned successfully consequently using a volume-controlled intermittent ventilation via an individually adapted face mask. We found 2 patients of the group with endotracheal intubation (median age 59 +/- 15 years, 11 female, 14 male, median duration of mechanical ventilation via tube 18 +/- 12 days) to have visible injuries of the respiratory tract without consecutive surgery being necessary. All of them were successfully weaned from respirator via noninvasive ventilation (in 2 of them completely spontaneous breathing was re-established, 23 patients needed intermittent ventilation at home). Of the 37 patients with tracheostomy (median age 59 +/- 15 years, 15 female, 22 male, median duration of mechanical ventilation 57 +/- 27 days, tracheostomy on day 19 +/- 12) 19 cases (51%) showed endoscopically visible injuries of the respiratory tract of whom 7 cases (19%) were severe and made consecutive surgery necessary. 29 patients were discharged with noninvasive ventilation at home, 5 needed further invasive ventilation via tracheostomy and 3 patients breathed spontaneously without ventilatory support. The incidence of severe tracheal stenosis following long-term ventilation via tracheostomy was nearly 20% (1 tracheoesophageal fistula) and needed surgical treatment.
CONCLUSION: As even duration of ventilation via tracheal tube and mode of ventilation before transfer to our clinic was comparable in both groups noninvasive ventilation is an appropriate alternative to tracheostomy following endotracheal intubation for maintaining ventilatory support, especially for patients with chronic ventilatory insufficiency.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app