We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Intrathecal morphine. Double-blind evaluation of optimal dosage for analgesia after major lumbar spinal surgery.
Spine 1999 June 2
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different dosages of intrathecal morphine sulfate for postoperative analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Analgesia and respiratory depression after intrathecal morphine sulfate injection are dose related. The optimal dose to use for major spinal surgery is not known.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion with or without decompression were divided randomly into 3 groups of 20 patients each. Anesthesia, monitoring, and surgery were similar for all patients. Just before closing of the wound, morphine sulfate was injected into the dural sack under direct visualization. Patients in groups 1-3 received 0.2 mg, 0.3 mg, and 0.4 mg morphine, respectively. Routine analgesia, consisting of diclofenac, was prescribed to use if necessary. Measurements were made and compared between the groups at zero hours (on admission to the Intensive Care Unit), 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours after surgery.
RESULTS: At zero hours and at 12 hours after surgery, pain levels were similar in groups 2 and 3, but were significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.05). The respiratory rate was significantly lower in group 3 than in the other two groups (P < 0.05), and the arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) was consistently higher in group 3. PaCO2 decreased in all three groups over the first 24 hours. Pruritus and nausea did not differ among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: For adult patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion, 0.3 mg (0.004 mg/kg) is probably the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine to manage pain.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different dosages of intrathecal morphine sulfate for postoperative analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Analgesia and respiratory depression after intrathecal morphine sulfate injection are dose related. The optimal dose to use for major spinal surgery is not known.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion with or without decompression were divided randomly into 3 groups of 20 patients each. Anesthesia, monitoring, and surgery were similar for all patients. Just before closing of the wound, morphine sulfate was injected into the dural sack under direct visualization. Patients in groups 1-3 received 0.2 mg, 0.3 mg, and 0.4 mg morphine, respectively. Routine analgesia, consisting of diclofenac, was prescribed to use if necessary. Measurements were made and compared between the groups at zero hours (on admission to the Intensive Care Unit), 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours after surgery.
RESULTS: At zero hours and at 12 hours after surgery, pain levels were similar in groups 2 and 3, but were significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.05). The respiratory rate was significantly lower in group 3 than in the other two groups (P < 0.05), and the arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) was consistently higher in group 3. PaCO2 decreased in all three groups over the first 24 hours. Pruritus and nausea did not differ among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: For adult patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion, 0.3 mg (0.004 mg/kg) is probably the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine to manage pain.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app