We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Usefulness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis].
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 1999 Februrary
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the applicability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the microbiological diagnostic of meningococcal meningitis as compared with the conventional methods (Gram stain and culture).
METHODS: One hundred and fifteen cerebrospinalis fluid samples from 115 patients with suspicious symptoms of meningitis were studied. 47 of them belonged to patients suspicious for meningococcal disease; 28 to patients with bacterial meningitis of other infectious etiologies; 10 to patients with meningitis showing lymphocytic pleocytosis and 30 to patients with an unconfirmed meningitis. The cerebrospinalis fluid samples were processed for culture by standard procedures and by PCR according to the method described by Newcombe et al for peripheral blood samples.
RESULTS: Thirty five out of 39 patients suspicious of meningococcal meningitis were microbiologically confirmed, being 22 culture and PCR positive, 3 microscopically and PCR positive, 1 only microscopically positive, and 9 positive only by PCR. By using PCR methodology, the number of confirmed diagnostics of meningococcal meningitis increased in a 23% as compared to those obtained by microscopic observation and culture. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value and predictive negative value were 87.1, 98.7, 97.1 and 94.1 respectively for the PCR method.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that PCR can be used on routine basis as a complementary technique to the standard laboratory procedures for diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis.
METHODS: One hundred and fifteen cerebrospinalis fluid samples from 115 patients with suspicious symptoms of meningitis were studied. 47 of them belonged to patients suspicious for meningococcal disease; 28 to patients with bacterial meningitis of other infectious etiologies; 10 to patients with meningitis showing lymphocytic pleocytosis and 30 to patients with an unconfirmed meningitis. The cerebrospinalis fluid samples were processed for culture by standard procedures and by PCR according to the method described by Newcombe et al for peripheral blood samples.
RESULTS: Thirty five out of 39 patients suspicious of meningococcal meningitis were microbiologically confirmed, being 22 culture and PCR positive, 3 microscopically and PCR positive, 1 only microscopically positive, and 9 positive only by PCR. By using PCR methodology, the number of confirmed diagnostics of meningococcal meningitis increased in a 23% as compared to those obtained by microscopic observation and culture. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value and predictive negative value were 87.1, 98.7, 97.1 and 94.1 respectively for the PCR method.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that PCR can be used on routine basis as a complementary technique to the standard laboratory procedures for diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app