CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Symptomatic spleno-mesenteric-portal venous thrombosis: recanalization and reconstruction with endovascular stents.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of portal reconstruction in patients with symptomatic spleno-mesenteric-portal venous thrombosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Portal reconstruction was attempted in 21 patients (seven women, 14 men; mean age, 53.6 years +/- 15.2) with chronic thrombosis of the portal vein alone (n = 8), splenic vein alone (n = 3), or portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins (n = 10). Indications for the procedure were bleeding varices (n = 15), ascites (n = 2), hypersplenism (n = 2), and enteropathy (n = 2). Sixteen procedures were started transhepatically and of these seven were converted to a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) after successful recanalization of the thrombosed vein. In six patients reconstructions were performed using an intrahepatic portal vein as outflow. Five procedures were performed primarily as TIPS. Wallstents dilated to 7-10 mm were used for reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 15.2 months +/- 15.9.
RESULTS: Technical success of portal reconstruction was 85.7% (18 of 21). Thirty-day mortality was 14.3% (three of 21) but was not procedural related. The cumulative rates of survival, primary patency, and palliation at 43 months of follow-up were 61.2% +/- 13.5%, 63.5% +/- 15.3%, and 31.7% +/- 15.7%, respectively. Secondary patency was 79.1% +/- 13.8%. The only predictor of mortality was the presence of liver disease (P = .001, Cox regression).
CONCLUSION: Portal reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic chronic portal thrombosis. Liver disease predisposes to a higher mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Portal reconstruction was attempted in 21 patients (seven women, 14 men; mean age, 53.6 years +/- 15.2) with chronic thrombosis of the portal vein alone (n = 8), splenic vein alone (n = 3), or portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins (n = 10). Indications for the procedure were bleeding varices (n = 15), ascites (n = 2), hypersplenism (n = 2), and enteropathy (n = 2). Sixteen procedures were started transhepatically and of these seven were converted to a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) after successful recanalization of the thrombosed vein. In six patients reconstructions were performed using an intrahepatic portal vein as outflow. Five procedures were performed primarily as TIPS. Wallstents dilated to 7-10 mm were used for reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 15.2 months +/- 15.9.
RESULTS: Technical success of portal reconstruction was 85.7% (18 of 21). Thirty-day mortality was 14.3% (three of 21) but was not procedural related. The cumulative rates of survival, primary patency, and palliation at 43 months of follow-up were 61.2% +/- 13.5%, 63.5% +/- 15.3%, and 31.7% +/- 15.7%, respectively. Secondary patency was 79.1% +/- 13.8%. The only predictor of mortality was the presence of liver disease (P = .001, Cox regression).
CONCLUSION: Portal reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic chronic portal thrombosis. Liver disease predisposes to a higher mortality.
Full text links
Trending Papers
The five types of glomerulonephritis classified by pathogenesis, activity, and chronicity (GN-AC).Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2023 May 23
American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.Gastroenterology 2023 June
The future of intensive care: the study of the microcirculation will help to guide our therapies.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2023 May 17
Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis: From Pathophysiology to Management.Endocrine Reviews 2023 March 29
Invasive candidiasis: current clinical challenges and unmet needs in adult populations.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2023 May 24
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app