COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
REVIEW

Hyperbaric or normobaric oxygen for acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a randomised controlled clinical trial

C D Scheinkestel, M Bailey, P S Myles, K Jones, D J Cooper, I L Millar, D V Tuxen
Medical Journal of Australia 1999 March 1, 170 (5): 203-10
10092916

OBJECTIVE: To assess neurological sequelae in patients with all grades of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning after treatment with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and normobaric oxygen (NBO).

DESIGN: Randomised controlled double-blind trial, including an extended series of neuropsychological tests and sham treatments in a multiplace hyperbaric chamber for patients treated with NBO.

SETTING: The multiplace hyperbaric chamber at the Alfred Hospital, a university-attached quarternary referral centre in Melbourne providing the only hyperbaric service in the State of Victoria.

PATIENTS: All patients referred with CO poisoning between 1 September 1993 and 30 December 1995, irrespective of severity of poisoning. Pregnant women, children, burns victims and those refusing consent were excluded.

INTERVENTION: Daily 100-minute treatments with 100% oxygen in a hyperbaric chamber--60 minutes at 2.8 atmospheres absolute for the HBO group and at 1.0 atmosphere absolute for the NBO group--for three days (or for six days for patients who were clinically abnormal or had poor neuropsychological outcome after three treatments). Both groups received continuous high flow oxygen between treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neuropsychological performance at completion of treatment, and at one month where possible.

RESULTS: More patients in the HBO group required additional treatments (28% v. 15%, P = 0.01 for all patients; 35% v. 13%, P = 0.001 for severely poisoned patients). HBO patients had a worse outcome in the learning test at completion of treatment (P = 0.01 for all patients; P = 0.005 for severely poisoned patients) and a greater number of abnormal test results at completion of treatment (P = 0.02 for all patients; P = 0.008 for severely poisoned patients). A greater percentage of severely poisoned patients in the HBO group had a poor outcome at completion of treatment (P = 0.03). Delayed neurological sequelae were restricted to HBO patients (P = 0.03). No outcome measure was worse in the NBO group.

CONCLUSION: In this trial, in which both groups received high doses of oxygen, HBO therapy did not benefit, and may have worsened, the outcome. We cannot recommend its use in CO poisoning.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
10092916
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.