Tonsillectomy and the value of peritonsillar infiltrations
L A Costas-Gastiaburo, V Rajah, J Rubin
South African Journal of Surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Chirurgie 1998, 36 (4): 142-5
10083972
In this prospective double-blind trial, the effect of peritonsillar infiltrations was assessed with regard to intra-operative bleeding and postoperative pain in 100 young adults who underwent elective tonsillectomy under balanced general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 groups (20 patients in each group) and received infiltrations as follows: group 1--bupivacaine (0.5%) with adrenaline (1:200,000); group II--bupivacaine (0.5%); group III--normal saline with adrenaline (1:200,000); group IV--normal saline; group V--no infiltration (control group). With regard to blood loss, groups I-IV lost a mean of 47 ml (95% CI = 69.78), while group V lost a mean of 121 ml (95% CI = 78.10) (P = 0.0002). Group V had the highest pain score (average 4.62) measured in recovery, 4 and 24 hours after tonsillectomy (P = 0.0051) and required more narcotic analgesia. Groups II and III had the lowest score (average 1.72) after 24 hours. The bupivacaine group (II) had the highest incidence (71.4%) of nausea and vomiting. Peritonsillar infiltrations decrease intra-operative bleeding and pain, independent of the type of solution infiltrated, by providing a better defined plane of dissection which minimises trauma to the surrounding tissue. Normal saline infiltrations with or without adrenaline should be used since they have no side-effects and are inexpensive and easily available.
Full Text Links
Find Full Text Links for this Article
You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.