We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Review
Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer management.
Estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) have now been studied in clinical breast cancer for more than 20 years. Positive receptor status correlates with favorable prognostic features including a lower rate of cell proliferation and histologic evidence of tumor differentiation. During the first several years after diagnosis, patients with ER-positive tumors tend to have a lower recurrence rate; however, this is balanced by a higher recurrence rate in subsequent years so that the overall prognostic significance of receptor status is modest. ER and PR have their greatest utility in predicting response to hormonal therapy, both in the adjuvant setting and for advanced disease. When the assay is done properly and cut-offs for ER-negativity and positivity are defined by clinical studies of patients treated with endocrine therapy, receptor status is very helpful in identifying groups of patients who are very unlikely to benefit from hormonal therapy. Tumors that express both ER and PR have the greatest benefit from hormonal therapy, but those containing only ER or only PR still have significant responses. Two types of estrogen receptors, ERalpha and ERbeta, have now been identified. Although there is considerable homology between these receptor forms, they appear to have important structural and functional differences that may be important for tissue and promoter-specific regulation of gene expression. These receptor forms, as well as ER variants and mutants, may also contribute to hormonal sensitivity and resistance. PR also exists in two forms, PRA and PRB. PRA appears to have repressor functions on both PRB and ERalpha, and the ratio of PRA to PRB in clinical breast tumors needs to be studied for its possible clinical relevance. Expression of receptor-interacting proteins can also modulate ER transcriptional activity, and these too need additional study to determine if they are markers of hormonal sensitivity or resistance. In summary, ER and PR status are important biomarkers that help physicians individualize therapy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app