We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Reduction of leg wound infections following coronary artery bypass surgery.
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 1999 January
OBJECTIVE: To reduce the rate of infection at the saphenous vein harvest site after coronary artery bypass surgery, to identify predictors of infection and to determine the best method for leg wound closure.
DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to determine the best technique for reducing the postoperative leg wound infection rate. Patients were allocated to one of four leg wound closure methods: staples, close immediately; staples, close after protamine administration; subcuticular sutures, close immediately; and subcuticular sutures, close after protamine. Risk factors evaluated were age, sex, diabetes, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, reoperation, time in surgery, wound length, wound depth, time that the wound was open, wound quality and harvest site.
SETTING: The Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
PATIENTS: All consenting patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery involving saphenous vein harvesting were considered for the study. Exclusion criteria were insertion of a drain, insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump in the index limb and inability to complete follow-up at the authors' centre. Eighty patients were initially enrolled, with 77 completing the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent standard saphenous vein harvesting followed by wound closure as indicated by the study group.
MAIN RESULTS: The major infection rate was reduced from 13% to 3% (P = 0.02). Each closure method was equally effective, and wound depth was the only factor related to infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Leg wound infections continue to be a major source of morbidity after coronary bypass surgery.
DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to determine the best technique for reducing the postoperative leg wound infection rate. Patients were allocated to one of four leg wound closure methods: staples, close immediately; staples, close after protamine administration; subcuticular sutures, close immediately; and subcuticular sutures, close after protamine. Risk factors evaluated were age, sex, diabetes, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, reoperation, time in surgery, wound length, wound depth, time that the wound was open, wound quality and harvest site.
SETTING: The Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
PATIENTS: All consenting patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery involving saphenous vein harvesting were considered for the study. Exclusion criteria were insertion of a drain, insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump in the index limb and inability to complete follow-up at the authors' centre. Eighty patients were initially enrolled, with 77 completing the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent standard saphenous vein harvesting followed by wound closure as indicated by the study group.
MAIN RESULTS: The major infection rate was reduced from 13% to 3% (P = 0.02). Each closure method was equally effective, and wound depth was the only factor related to infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Leg wound infections continue to be a major source of morbidity after coronary bypass surgery.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app