Eduard A van Bodegraven, Tess M E van Ramshorst, Svein O Bratlie, Arto Kokkola, Ernesto Sparrelid, Bergthor Björnsson, Dyre Kleive, Stefan K Burgdorf, Safi Dokmak, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Santiago Sánchez Cabús, I Quintus Molenaar, Ugo Boggi, Olivier R Busch, Miha Petrič, Geert Roeyen, Thilo Hackert, Daan J Lips, Mathieu D'Hondt, Mariëlle M E Coolsen, Giovanni Ferrari, Bobby Tingstedt, Alejandro Serrablo, Sebastien Gaujoux, Marco Ramera, Igor Khatkov, Fabio Ausania, Regis Souche, Sebastiaan Festen, Frederik Berrevoet, Tobias Keck, Robert P Sutcliffe, Elizabeth Pando, Roeland F de Wilde, Beatrice Aussilhou, Paul S Krohn, Bjørn Edwin, Per Sandström, Stefan Gilg, Hanna Seppänen, Caroline Vilhav, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Marc G Besselink
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend monitoring of the use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS). However, data from prospective international audits on minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) are lacking. This study examined the use and outcome of robot-assisted (RDP) and laparoscopic (LDP) distal pancreatectomy in the E-MIPS registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-hoc analysis in a prospective audit on MIPS, including consecutive patients undergoing MIDP in 83 centers from 19 European countries (01-01-2019/31-12-2021)...
March 18, 2024: International Journal of Surgery