Stefano Raffa, Francesco Lanfranchi, Camilla Satragno, Flavio Giannelli, Michela Marcenaro, Angela Coco, Sofia Elizabeth Cena, Luca Sofia, Cecilia Marini, Serafina Mammoliti, Alessia Levaggi, Alberto Stefano Tagliafico, Gianmario Sambuceti, Salvina Barra, Silvia Morbelli, Liliana Belgioia, Matteo Bauckneht
The last version of the FIGO classification recommended imaging tools to complete the clinical assessment of patients with cervical cancer. However, the preferable imaging approach is still unclear. We aimed to explore the prognostic power of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (ceCT), and [18 F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ([18 F]FDG-PET)/CT in patients staged for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC, FIGO stages IB3-IVA). Thirty-six LACC patients (mean age 55...
September 5, 2023: Current Problems in Cancer