Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of the prevalence and specificities of asymptomatic paranasal sinus aspergillosis: retrospective study of 59 cases.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To calculate the prevalence of asymptomatic localized paranasal sinus aspergillosis (or fungus ball) in the general population and to compare asymptomatic and symptomatic fungus balls (FB) in order to determine their specificities.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study including 59 patients operated for FB between 2006 and 2011 in a single unit. Patients were divided into two groups: asymptomatic patients (group 1, n=10), and symptomatic patients (group 2, n=49). All patients in group 1 were identified by systematic screening for a site of infection prior to cataract surgery during this period (n=6198). All patients were treated by endonasal surgery. Calculation of the prevalence of asymptomatic FB was based on standardization of the source population (normal distribution, 95% confidence interval). The two groups were then compared (clinical context, age, history of root canal treatment, topography, recurrence rate), after randomization test by Student's test and Chi(2) test.

RESULTS: The prevalence rate of asymptomatic FB in our study was 1.6/1000 in the population over the age of 55 years. A statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the two groups in terms of the following parameters: more advanced age for patients of group 1, constant history of root canal treatment in group 1, constant maxillary topography in group 1, and higher recurrence rate in group 2. Mean follow-up was 18.7 months (range: 3-49 months).

DISCUSSION: This study, the first to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic FB, suggests the existence of very slowly progressive, minimally symptomatic forms, raising the problem of the surgical indications in these patients.

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of asymptomatic fungus balls is 1.6/1000. Prospective studies are necessary to justify conservative management in these patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app